The Rescuers Down Under

You know, I’ve been thinking a few things over. I called the animated sequence of Mary Poppins unnecessary, but still gave it the #2 spot when I reviewed it. Then why was I so harsh with The Little Mermaid? I’ve realized that just because there’s a bit of a flaw in the outcome of an otherwise great film, doesn’t mean it deserves to be cast down so low.

I’m bringing it up to #3.

Anyway, 1990 saw the second film of the Renaissance and the first sequel made by Disney. Eva Gabor and Bob Newhart returned to reprise their roles of Bianca and Bernard in The Rescuers Down Under. But there’s also a couple new roles, featuring John Candy and George C. Scott of Patton fame. Although it failed at the box office, its opening weekend saw it fourth behind Home Alone, Rocky V, and Child’s Play 2.

Set in the Australian Outback, the poacher McLeach (Scott) has kidnapped the young boy, Cody (Adam Ryen) in order to capture an endangered golden eagle named  Marahute. Bianca and Bernard come to his rescue with the help of Orville’s brother, Wilbur (Candy) and a kangaroo rat named Jake (Tristan Rogers).

While this film did poorly in theaters, I actually find it to be much better than the original. It’s one of those sequels that didn’t try to shoehorn in a continuation of the first film, nor did it exaggerate the lesser qualities of our favorite characters and completely ruin them. It presents our characters having actually matured between the films and gives them a completely new adventure. That’s not to say that new adventures always make for a great sequel (Temple of Doom, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace). The Rescuers Down Under didn’t need exaggeration to make it bigger and better. It had a greater production value by using computer animation to give it the wonderful sense of grandeur it had. It’s a very beautifully animated film with a lot of big moments that really work, like the opening scene showing the Outback.

Anyway, despite Cody being kidnapped, you’d never describe him as helpless. Many times, he’s actually trying to find a way out of the predicament he’s in. He even has the spine to stand up to McLeach at certain times. And speaking of our villain, McLeach is just a guy trying to make money, he just happens to do it in a very unethical and illegal way. I’ve said that Disney portrays the criminal class rather well with Sykes as the organized gangster and Ratigan as the criminal mastermind. McLeach is the manipulative, street smart, black market thug out for himself and doesn’t care who gets in his way, because he’ll just get rid of them. His (short) version of “Home on the Range” is twisted and shows that he really just sees everything as a means to an end. George C. Scott also had the best voice for him.

Bernard also goes through quite a bit in this film. While it’s hilarious to see him continually be interrupted when trying to propose, you can feel his frustration. But his best moments are when he used the advice given by Jake early on in the film to get a razorback to do his bidding. He went from a superstitious coward in the first film, to someone willing to take risks by the end of this one. And it worked.

Wilbur is also fun as the main source of comedic relief. And it’s good that they gave him his own subplot after arriving in Australia. Following the mice around and complaining about a bad back would have made the film suffer. However, Frank is the funniest character in the movie.

The music is done really well too. But, note that this is the only Disney Renaissance film to not be a musical. The original really wasn’t and this one didn’t need to be either.

#11.